comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: plot of implicit function
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: plot of implicit function [message #73572 is a reply to message #73571] Fri, 19 November 2010 02:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Wout De Nolf is currently offline  Wout De Nolf
Messages: 194
Registered: October 2008
Senior Member
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:24:28 -0800 (PST), Andrea
<negri.andre@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello, I have an analitical 3D streamfunction, and I want to plot it.
> I looked here http://www.dfanning.com/tips/particle_3d.html and it's
> exactly what I want,

Isn't a streamfunction like a vectorfield? Shouldn't you be using
something like this (but then in 3D):
http://michaelgalloy.com/2008/03/19/overview-of-flow-visuali zation-in-idl.html

> but I have an a implicit definition of
> coordinates:
> f(R,phi,z)=t
> g(R,phi,z)=t
> h(R,phi,z)=t

I don't understand. So you have coordinates (R,phi,z) which can be
easily transformed to (x,y,z). f,g and h aren't defining the
vectorfield are they? So what are they and how is your vectorfield
based upon them? Maybe I'm missing something obvious here...
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: MATHSTAT_154: Dynamically Loadable Module is unavailable on this platform: IMSL
Next Topic: volume visualization and isosurface of axisymmetric data

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:49:13 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40446 seconds