comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: high quality 'old' direct graphics
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: high quality 'old' direct graphics [message #73730 is a reply to message #73728] Wed, 24 November 2010 07:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Paolo writes:

> now I am totally confused.
>
> I haven't gotten to play around with IDL 8 (we just don't have it,
> I guess astronomers just prefer to work with old software).
>
> From what I understood from the new object graphic system, the point
> was that you could give various dot commands (if you create an
> object myplot=plot(x,y) and then you would issue comamnds like
>
> ...
>
> only better looking (and that should apply for all graphic keywords,
> with maybe a few new ones added).
>
> Is my understanding right?

I think your understanding probably comes from listening
to the marketing folks, but, yes, that's the general idea. :-)

> If it is, why we need the wrapper?

Uh, mostly to tide you over until 2018. :-)

Or, alternatively, to give you graphics commands that are
fast, simple to build, and work intuitively, none of which
applies to new graphics commands, although maybe you
could argue the last point. But when an image appears as a
tiny dot in your graphics window and surfaces have
axes that are obscured by the data, you wonder if anyone
is actually thinking about how these commands are suppose
to be used by people who are trying to get some work done.

> If it isn't, what went wrong with the new plot objects?

It's not that anything has gone wrong with the new graphics
objects, it's just that not all that much has ever gone right.

I still have hope, but not enough to stop publication of
a book on traditional graphics, which I think people will
still be using 10 years from now, when we are on the 6th
(or will it be 7th) "new" edition of the New Graphics.

Sooner or later, we are going to have to get something
simple or we will never get enough bugs out of it to
make it useful. IDL 8 graphics are clearly a step in
the right direction. But I have my doubts about whether
they are the final answer.

In the meantime, there will still be software available
that gets the job done in a simple, elegant way. :-)

Cheers,

David

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Questions about IDL 8.0
Next Topic: Make IDL record console output to a file automatically?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 20:07:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.78393 seconds