comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Questions about IDL 8.0
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Questions about IDL 8.0 [message #73739 is a reply to message #73738] Tue, 23 November 2010 16:30 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Paulo Penteado writes:

> If your question is why it works with the first table, and not the
> second, I do not have an answer. I would not expect it to work with
> either, because 3 is the second dimension.
>
> I verified that both work when I use the transpose of what ctload
> returns.

Ah, I see. CTLOAD returns a 256x3 array, because that's
what TVLCT expects. Makes sense I guess that new graphics
is doing everything in a contrary fashion. Why leverage
old code when you make people write everything from
scratch? :-)

Cheers,

David

P.S. I guess I'll add a NG keyword to flip things around
so I can use the program where I need it. Thanks!


--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Make IDL record console output to a file automatically?
Next Topic: Re: high quality 'old' direct graphics

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 07:06:21 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87939 seconds