| Re: LIST "bug": .Remove on an empty list [message #73969 is a reply to message #73968] |
Tue, 14 December 2010 15:19   |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Michael Galloy writes:
> Yes, that's why I thought "function graphics" would be a good name.
> Maybe some kind of numbered system? I think we would be up to new 4.0
> graphics now? With "old" graphics being direct graphics, then object
> graphics, Live Tools, iTools, and "new graphics"? Am I missing some
> other graphics systems?
Gosh, I never thought I would end up a taxonomist. I may be missing
something, but aren't there five items on your list? Are we
starting the count from zero, like in IDL?
What in the world would you call these new FSC_*** routines
I've been working on? They aren't direct graphics, and they
are a hell of a lot better than Live Tools. Probably better
than iTools, too. Maybe we should number them by the year
they were created. Then you could look back on them like
you look back on failed marriages or bad relationships.
You might even feel better about the new stuff. :-)
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
