comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Over-PLOT() on MAP()?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Over-PLOT() on MAP()? [message #74003 is a reply to message #73920] Mon, 13 December 2010 11:23 Go to previous message
Matt Haffner is currently offline  Matt Haffner
Messages: 34
Registered: October 2000
Member
On Dec 11, 8:01 pm, Paulo Penteado <pp.pente...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 10:55 pm, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure this is a "limitation" so much as just
>> a poorly documented feature. I think it is absolutely
>> correct that the "data space" of a map projection should
>> be in projected XY coordinates, rather than in lat/lon
>> space. It is just about the only thing about the new
>> graphics that actually makes a lot of sense to me. :-)
>
> The problem in this case (and in imap) is that the projection can be
> changed (by the property map_projection), and the things put there by
> the plot do not get updated to the new position. One would have to get
> the new map structure, call map_proj_forward again, and update the
> plot data.

Yes, that is a serious limitation. I was hoping I was overlooking
something--thanks for the workaround. I resorted to using ELLIPSE for
now to get something going, but it's pretty slow (and probably has way
too much overhead) for a serious number of data points, even when
turning off .Refresh.

mh
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Butterworth Band-Pass Filter
Next Topic: 3D vector rotation to the Z axis

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 20:15:19 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.67968 seconds