comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: FSC

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: FSC_PLOT defaults

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: FSC_PLOT defaults [message #74138 is a reply to message #74136]

Tue, 21 December 2010 08:37

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Wayne Landsman writes:

> Yeah, the problem is that at least on my display the
> THICK keywords don't work in fractional amounts.
> XTHICK = 1.5 (which I would prefer) is the same as XTHICK=2.

Yes, I think in direct graphics, THICK will define the
number of pixels used for the lines. By itself, this isn't
too bad, but then the problem of no anti-aliasing raises
its ugly head. Things start to look a little "blocky".

I've just tried this on a contour plot, and the contour
line labels really start to bother me at this thickness.

I guess I am still preferring the original plots with
their single line thickness. I mostly use the display for
"quick looks" at the plot. Most of my output these days
is really produced automatically from PostScript files
and ImageMagick, which handles the anti-aliasing of
text, etc. for me. Fine tuning, of course, is trivial
in the PostScript file.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: lecacheux.alain on Mon, 27 December 2010 00:51
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Fri, 24 December 2010 22:01
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Fri, 24 December 2010 10:55
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: Michael Galloy on Thu, 23 December 2010 21:05
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Thu, 23 December 2010 18:03
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: wlandsman on Thu, 23 December 2010 16:02
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: wlandsman on Thu, 23 December 2010 15:42
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: penteado on Thu, 23 December 2010 12:53
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: Mark[1] on Thu, 23 December 2010 12:35
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: lecacheux.alain on Thu, 23 December 2010 12:34
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Thu, 23 December 2010 11:10
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Thu, 23 December 2010 10:08
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: wlandsman on Thu, 23 December 2010 08:38
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Wed, 22 December 2010 09:11
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: lecacheux.alain on Wed, 22 December 2010 05:51
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: Bruce Bowler on Wed, 22 December 2010 05:22
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 13:56
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: ben.bighair on Tue, 21 December 2010 12:38
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: Marc Buie on Tue, 21 December 2010 10:53
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 09:58
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: ben.bighair on Tue, 21 December 2010 09:53
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 08:37
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: wlandsman on Tue, 21 December 2010 08:19
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 07:58
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Tue, 21 December 2010 07:39
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 07:19
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 07:06
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 06:51
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Tue, 21 December 2010 06:45
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: Marc Buie on Tue, 21 December 2010 05:58
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: penteado on Mon, 20 December 2010 18:03
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: ben.bighair on Mon, 20 December 2010 17:43
		Re: FSC_PLOT defaults By: David Fanning on Mon, 20 December 2010 14:57

Previous Topic:	Re: updating the coyote library
Next Topic:	Re: Hodograph plots of wind speed and direction

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:06:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00459 seconds