comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics [message #74280]

Fri, 07 January 2011 09:42

Marc Buie
Messages: 12
Registered: December 2010

Junior Member

Norbert -

Aha, I bet that is what's covered by the preamble in the output file:

%!PS-Adobe-3.0 EPSF-3.0

I tried including my new graphic in my LaTeX master document without change and it does indeed work just fine. I learned postscript pretty well back in the early 90's and haven't bothered to update my manuals or my knowledge. Sounds like PS and EPS are pretty much redundant names for the same thing now days.

Thanks,
Marc

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics By: Marc Buie on Fri, 07 January 2011 09:42
		Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics By: Marc Buie on Fri, 07 January 2011 09:31
		Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics By: Norbert Hahn on Fri, 07 January 2011 09:24
		Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Fri, 07 January 2011 09:00

Previous Topic:	fitting with asymmetric errors?
Next Topic:	Re: fitting with asymmetric errors?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 07:54:43 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.12141 seconds