comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL 8, EPS vs. PS graphics [message #74282 is a reply to message #74281] Fri, 07 January 2011 09:24 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Norbert Hahn is currently offline  Norbert Hahn
Messages: 46
Registered: May 2003
Member
Marc Buie <ecom1@olblue.net> wrote:

> Folks -
>
> I just got around to trying to use the new plot functions on the creation of publication quality graphics. I've long thought this would help me in many ways. One of my needs is to save the careful crafted graphic in a variety of formats. I have always saved such graphics in both encapsulated (EPS) and regular postscript (PS). I need both flavors at different times in the publication process. I just ran this in the obvious way and find that '.ps' and '.eps' files are absolutely identical and it is my understand that this cannot be correct. One telling sign is that there is a "showpage" at the end of both. I thought encapsulated files were not allowed to have a showpage.

The early specification of EPS did not allow showpage. The latest spec,
which dates back to 1996 (+-2 years), does allow showpage. I haven't
found Adobe Technical Note #5002, "Encapsulated PostScript File Format
Specification" online.

BTW: The latest changes to PS date back to 1999:
http://www.adobe.com/products/postscript/pdfs/PLRM.pdf
contains an ealier but free version of "PostScript Language Reference
Manual, Adobe Systems Addison-Wesley, 1999; ISBN 0201379228".

Norbert
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: fitting with asymmetric errors?
Next Topic: Re: fitting with asymmetric errors?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 07:55:34 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.16129 seconds