comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: 2d min

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: 2d min [message #74378 is a reply to message #74373]

Wed, 12 January 2011 15:44

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Gray writes:

> Yes, but that will be slow compared to a vectorized solution, is my
> guess.

I learned from Matt Savoie that looking for vectorized solutions
before you needed to was a fool's errand. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: 2d min By: Gray on Thu, 13 January 2011 09:07
		Re: 2d min By: rogass on Thu, 13 January 2011 05:57
		Re: 2d min By: Gray on Thu, 13 January 2011 05:11
		Re: 2d min By: Gray on Thu, 13 January 2011 04:26
		Re: 2d min By: rogass on Wed, 12 January 2011 23:18
		Re: 2d min By: David Fanning on Wed, 12 January 2011 15:44
		Re: 2d min By: Gray on Wed, 12 January 2011 15:06
		Re: 2d min By: Kenneth P. Bowman on Wed, 12 January 2011 14:45

Previous Topic:	r_correlate; get "loop limit expression too large" error with /Kendall
Next Topic:	Efficient finding of locations where two 'on' pixels are next to one another

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 23:20:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36000 seconds