comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » self programming IDL needed?

Home » Public Forums » archive » self programming IDL needed?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: self programming IDL needed? [message #7439 is a reply to message #7355]

Tue, 12 November 1996 00:00

Christian Soeller
Messages: 46
Registered: August 1996

Member

MICHEL KRUGLANSKI <M.Kruglanski@oma.be> writes:

>> ; now call my dynamic definitions procedure...
>> dyndef
>
> I think that it will work only once.
> The second time, the dyndef procedure will not be re-compiled;
> the old definition will be used by IDL. So you need to create
> each time a new name for the procedure

What about using
RESOLVE_ROUTINE, 'dyndef'

before you call dyndef, as the refrence says:

The RESOLVE_ROUTINE procedure compiles user-written or library
procedures or functions, given their names. Routines are compiled even
if they are already defined (!!!). This procedure is similar to the .COMPILE
executive command, but can be invoked within procedures and functions.

Maybe that will do it ?

Christian

------------------------------------------------------------ --------
Christian Soeller mailto: csoelle@sghms.ac.uk
St. Georges Hospital Medical School Dept. of Pharmacology
Cranmer Terrace London SW17 0RE

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		self programming IDL needed? By: alpha on Mon, 11 November 1996 00:00
		Re: self programming IDL needed? By: Christian Soeller on Tue, 12 November 1996 00:00
		Re: self programming IDL needed? By: MICHEL KRUGLANSKI on Tue, 12 November 1996 00:00
		Re: self programming IDL needed? By: davidf on Mon, 11 November 1996 00:00
		Re: self programming IDL needed? By: alpha on Fri, 15 November 1996 00:00

Previous Topic:	IDL and GDF
Next Topic:	Re: Writing mpeg from IDL (pseudo_to_true included)

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 01:18:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.11354 seconds