comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: changing matrix size using interpolation

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: changing matrix size using interpolation

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: changing matrix size using interpolation [message #74419]

Mon, 17 January 2011 07:52

oxfordenergyservices is currently offline

oxfordenergyservices
Messages: 56
Registered: January 2009

Member

On Jan 17, 2:59 pm, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> David Fanning writes:
>> I think most people use the CONGRID command, with the INTERP
>> keyword set.
>
>> b = Congrid(a, 7, 7, /INTERP)
>
> And now that I think about it, I think the CENTER keyword
> should probably be set, too, especially if you are working
> with small arrays.
>
> b = Congrid(a, 7, 7, /INTERP, /CENTER)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David

Thanks David

I tried both ways, they look identical (in tv,bytscl and shade_surf)
but they do different things outside the topographic region (ie sea
level) when /cubic is set. They also seem to have 5% difference on
the land, but could be due to subtly different algorithms

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: changing matrix size using interpolation By: oxfordenergyservices on Mon, 17 January 2011 07:52
		Re: changing matrix size using interpolation By: David Fanning on Mon, 17 January 2011 06:59
		Re: changing matrix size using interpolation By: David Fanning on Mon, 17 January 2011 06:57

Previous Topic:	Re: Secondary axis in NG
Next Topic:	IDL routine to fill in gaps in line? / Searching IDL routine libraries?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 13:13:50 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.67882 seconds