comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package [message #75097 is a reply to message #75096]

Tue, 15 February 2011 08:11

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Ding writes:

> It is true, I found it a good replacement of keyword_set() which some
> times failed

I doubt it failed. It's often used for the wrong purpose
by people who judge its function by reading its name
instead of its documentation. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: Ding on Tue, 15 February 2011 10:59
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: Michael Galloy on Tue, 15 February 2011 10:35
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: cgguido on Tue, 15 February 2011 10:02
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 February 2011 09:12
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: Ding on Tue, 15 February 2011 09:05
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 February 2011 08:11
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: Ding on Tue, 15 February 2011 08:07
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: pgrigis on Tue, 15 February 2011 07:24
		Re: Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package By: rogass on Tue, 15 February 2011 05:06

Previous Topic:	Nonlinear Diffusion Image Filtering Package
Next Topic:	Re: Optimization Question: Sum at each element of array

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:39:13 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00437 seconds