comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists [message #75216 is a reply to message #75215]

Mon, 21 February 2011 19:17

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Heinz Stege writes:

> I believe, value_locate is an often underestimated function.

And there is a understated statement! :-)

Let's just say a lot of neat functionality in the new
book wouldn't be possible without the power
of Value_Locate!

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists By: Heinz Stege on Tue, 22 February 2011 02:18
		Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists By: Heinz Stege on Tue, 22 February 2011 02:16
		Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists By: Jeremy Bailin on Mon, 21 February 2011 21:21
		Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists By: wlandsman on Mon, 21 February 2011 20:02
		Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists By: David Fanning on Mon, 21 February 2011 19:17
		Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists By: Heinz Stege on Mon, 21 February 2011 18:45
		Re: Efficient comparison of array location in two lists By: wlandsman on Mon, 21 February 2011 16:43

Previous Topic:	intersection of two tracks(lat,lon)
Next Topic:	RK4 and IDL's array truncation

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 15:58:57 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.39942 seconds