comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » simple deconvolution

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: simple deconvolution [message #75289 is a reply to message #75210]

Wed, 23 February 2011 07:30

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Jeremy Bailin writes:

> Seriously?? I think += is much much clearer than the alternative.

I think programmers of a certain age are probably not
used to it. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		simple deconvolution By: rogass on Tue, 22 February 2011 07:00
		Re: simple deconvolution By: rogass on Wed, 23 February 2011 12:32
		Re: simple deconvolution By: pgrigis on Wed, 23 February 2011 08:14
		Re: simple deconvolution By: penteado on Wed, 23 February 2011 07:45
		Re: simple deconvolution By: David Fanning on Wed, 23 February 2011 07:30
		Re: simple deconvolution By: Jeremy Bailin on Wed, 23 February 2011 06:53
		Re: simple deconvolution By: rogass on Tue, 22 February 2011 23:40
		Re: simple deconvolution By: James[2] on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:49
		Re: simple deconvolution By: David Fanning on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:24
		Re: simple deconvolution By: James[2] on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:15
		Re: simple deconvolution By: wlandsman on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:03
		Re: simple deconvolution By: David Fanning on Tue, 22 February 2011 09:10
		Re: simple deconvolution By: rogass on Tue, 22 February 2011 08:49
		Re: simple deconvolution By: penteado on Tue, 22 February 2011 08:35

Previous Topic:	Re: Pixelwise temporal trend, problem with REFORM
Next Topic:	IDL on win7 crashing

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:34:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00503 seconds