comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » simple deconvolution
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: simple deconvolution [message #75296 is a reply to message #75210] Tue, 22 February 2011 15:49 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
James[2] is currently offline  James[2]
Messages: 44
Registered: November 2009
Member
On Feb 22, 3:24 pm, David Fanning <n...@idlcoyote.com> wrote:
> James writes:
>> Also, I think you should ease up on the ternary (? :) operator a
>> little bit.  It's useful for making concise expressions now and then,
>> but in general the if..then..else block makes more understandable code.
>
> I braved a += operator in an e-mail the other day
> where I thought the context would make its use
> totally transparent. Total chaos. I probably won't
> do that again for another couple of years. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David

Oh man, if += is wrong then I don't wanna be right.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Pixelwise temporal trend, problem with REFORM
Next Topic: IDL on win7 crashing

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:20:13 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00448 seconds