comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » simple deconvolution
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: simple deconvolution [message #75297 is a reply to message #75210] Tue, 22 February 2011 15:24 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
James writes:

> Also, I think you should ease up on the ternary (? :) operator a
> little bit. It's useful for making concise expressions now and then,
> but in general the if..then..else block makes more understandable code.

I braved a += operator in an e-mail the other day
where I thought the context would make its use
totally transparent. Total chaos. I probably won't
do that again for another couple of years. :-)

Cheers,

David


--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Pixelwise temporal trend, problem with REFORM
Next Topic: IDL on win7 crashing

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 07:02:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.67910 seconds