comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » simple deconvolution

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: simple deconvolution [message #75307 is a reply to message #75210]

Tue, 22 February 2011 08:35

penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018

Senior Member
Administrator

On Feb 22, 12:00 pm, chris <rog...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> but both go wrong for
> the recovery of both smoothed images and smoothed images plus noise .
> I'm a little bit confused about that. Maybe somebody could help me?

This is a little vague. "go wrong" can mean almost anything.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		simple deconvolution By: rogass on Tue, 22 February 2011 07:00
		Re: simple deconvolution By: rogass on Wed, 23 February 2011 12:32
		Re: simple deconvolution By: pgrigis on Wed, 23 February 2011 08:14
		Re: simple deconvolution By: penteado on Wed, 23 February 2011 07:45
		Re: simple deconvolution By: David Fanning on Wed, 23 February 2011 07:30
		Re: simple deconvolution By: Jeremy Bailin on Wed, 23 February 2011 06:53
		Re: simple deconvolution By: rogass on Tue, 22 February 2011 23:40
		Re: simple deconvolution By: James[2] on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:49
		Re: simple deconvolution By: David Fanning on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:24
		Re: simple deconvolution By: James[2] on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:15
		Re: simple deconvolution By: wlandsman on Tue, 22 February 2011 15:03
		Re: simple deconvolution By: David Fanning on Tue, 22 February 2011 09:10
		Re: simple deconvolution By: rogass on Tue, 22 February 2011 08:49
		Re: simple deconvolution By: penteado on Tue, 22 February 2011 08:35

Previous Topic:	Re: Pixelwise temporal trend, problem with REFORM
Next Topic:	IDL on win7 crashing

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 23:12:57 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.23741 seconds