comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Functions and arrays
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Functions and arrays [message #7590 is a reply to message #7579] Thu, 05 December 1996 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Anonymous
Originally posted by: XXX (Steve)

In article <32a695b9.0@epflnews.epfl.ch>, llobet@crpp.uhd.epfl.ch wrote:

> In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.961205155301.9297C-100000@demsyd.syd.dem.csiro.au>,
> Peter Mason <peterm@demsyd.syd.dem.csiro.au> writes:
>
> =But I think that a proper cure would involve a basic syntax change, like
> =using [] instead of () on arrays. If RSI proposed this, I think I would
> =actually consider supporting it. (I'm sure I'm pretty much alone in this
> =opinion - just thought I'd mention it.)
>
I think this is a good idea. I have no idea how hard it would be to
implement or what it would do to backwards compatibility. But by itself it
seems like a good idea.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: exp function bug
Next Topic: Re: Q regarding spawning in windows95

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:21:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.12194 seconds