comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » COMMON block question

Home » Public Forums » archive » COMMON block question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: common block question [message #75907 is a reply to message #23576]

Fri, 15 April 2011 08:33

penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018

Senior Member
Administrator

On Apr 15, 7:02 am, geoff <oxfordenergyservi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all your above comments. One of my issues is that I may
> have to re-code in fortran or C and run on a parallel machine (or may
> not!). I would prefer to write the program in IDL in a way that is
> relatively transferrable to fortran95 ultimately, which is why I
> considered common blocks which turn into modules that can be called in
> fortran.

I also had on many occasions to suffer from global variables through
Fortran modules.

Structures, pointers and objects as I suggested above are all pretty
much possible to directly translate to Fortran.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		COMMON block question By: Paul van Delst on Tue, 30 January 2001 07:53
		Re: common block question By: pgrigis on Thu, 14 April 2011 07:20
		Re: common block question By: oxfordenergyservices on Fri, 15 April 2011 03:02
		Re: common block question By: penteado on Wed, 13 April 2011 16:21
		Re: common block question By: David Fanning on Wed, 13 April 2011 14:17
		Re: common block question By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Fri, 15 April 2011 09:13
		Re: common block question By: penteado on Fri, 15 April 2011 08:33

Previous Topic:	IDL 8 GUI won't save all overplots on one image...help!!
Next Topic:	Cross signs when using postscript font

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 22:27:15 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08141 seconds