comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Functions and arrays
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Functions and arrays [message #7592 is a reply to message #7590] Thu, 05 December 1996 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
llobet is currently offline  llobet
Messages: 10
Registered: May 1993
Junior Member
In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.961205155301.9297C-100000@demsyd.syd.dem.csiro.au>,
Peter Mason <peterm@demsyd.syd.dem.csiro.au> writes:

=But I think that a proper cure would involve a basic syntax change, like
=using [] instead of () on arrays. If RSI proposed this, I think I would
=actually consider supporting it. (I'm sure I'm pretty much alone in this
=opinion - just thought I'd mention it.)

I would second this.

And yes, I am aware of the main implication: need to review all the existing
software. But it should be possible to automate it in most of the cases.


-xavier
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: exp function bug
Next Topic: Re: Q regarding spawning in windows95

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 14:20:39 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.71786 seconds