comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes)

Home » Public Forums » archive » TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes) [message #77005 is a reply to message #76912]

Mon, 18 July 2011 11:53

penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018

Senior Member
Administrator

On Jul 17, 1:22 am, Ed Hyer <ejh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> TIMEGEN manpage says this:
> "Note: If subintervals are provided by MONTHS, DAYS, HOURS, MINUTES,
> or SECONDS, then the first element may not be equal to the START time.
> In this case the first element in the returned array will be greater
> than or equal to START."
>
> This is not so:
> IDL>
> print,timegen(2,start=julday(7,1,2008,0,0,0),months=[1,7],un its='year'),for mat='(C())'
> Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 2008
> Tue Jul 01 00:00:00 2008

I think I am missing something, because I do not see the problem.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes) By: MarioIncandenza on Sat, 16 July 2011 21:22
		Re: TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes) By: penteado on Mon, 18 July 2011 11:56
		Re: TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes) By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Mon, 25 July 2011 10:55
		Re: TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes) By: penteado on Mon, 18 July 2011 11:53
		Re: TIMEGEN bug (not the pre-6.4 bug that Fanning describes) By: Haje Korth on Mon, 25 July 2011 13:57

Previous Topic:	CONTOUR problem
Next Topic:	Geodetic functions library GeoDLL 32 Bit and 64 Bit

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 00:28:18 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.64328 seconds