comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Comparing Speed of Graphical Output

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Comparing Speed of Graphical Output

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Comparing Speed of Graphical Output [message #78288]

Sat, 05 November 2011 12:02

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

David Fanning writes:

> (Forget
> for the moment that this solution doesn't produce the
> same graphic as the slower solution, and that it
> produces a different, different solution every time it
> runs! I presume he will get this to work, eventually.)

I realize now this statement only partially true. The graphic
is different (it is missing some connections), but it
is reproducible. I overlooked the random number generation
in my file. If you set the random numbers in Mark's
program like this:

cx = randomu(-3L, [np])
cy = randomu(-10L, [np])

Then you can see the missing connections near the
top of the plot.

Sorry for the confusion.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

Re: Comparing Speed of Graphical Output

By: David Fanning on Sat, 05 November 2011 12:02

Previous Topic:	Comparing Speed of Graphical Output
Next Topic:	Re: IDLDE linux cannot create workspace

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 07:58:57 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.60022 seconds