comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Another "IDL way to do this" question
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Another "IDL way to do this" question [message #78343 is a reply to message #78271] Wed, 09 November 2011 08:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Fabzou is currently offline  Fabzou
Messages: 76
Registered: November 2010
Member
On 11/09/2011 05:08 PM, Brian Wolven wrote:
> This routine doesn't require that they be the same, but if they were you'd get an additional boost in speed as you could reuse the indexing from one point to the next. It should still be much faster than interpol - author claims a speed-up of about 60 times. YMMV

Ah sorry I didn't look at the routine carefully. Yes, this may be
usefull in the regular case where z values are the same for each x-y-t
slice. But now it appears to be twice slower than interpol (on my
tests). David made a comment about this routine, which is now obsolete:

http://www.idlcoyote.com/tips/fast_interpolate.html

Thanks a lot!

Fabien
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Another "IDL way to do this" question
Next Topic: GRIB data question

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 09:14:29 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.72217 seconds