comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output [message #78693 is a reply to message #78688]

Thu, 15 December 2011 09:05

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

On Dec 15, 12:45 am, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:

> I would say that the major difference between the two
> systems is that Function Graphics creates HUGE files by
> default, whereas Coyote Graphics creates files that
> are about the size of normal IDL graphics windows by
> default.

David, by HUGE you mean the *file size* right? (and not the X/Y
dimensions)

I'm surprised in this day and age IDL is still rasterizing its
Postscript output instead of outputting vectors.

Craig

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output By: David Fanning on Thu, 15 December 2011 10:23
		Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output By: David Fanning on Thu, 15 December 2011 10:17
		Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output By: penteado on Thu, 15 December 2011 09:14
		Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output By: penteado on Thu, 15 December 2011 10:05
		Re: Compare Coyote Graphics Output with Function Graphics Output By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 15 December 2011 09:05

Previous Topic:	Re: Incomplete ouput PNG files.
Next Topic:	Re: Window with Black Background

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 11:03:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48304 seconds