comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: The best way to bin data to a grid? (may not be an IDL-specific question)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: The best way to bin data to a grid? (may not be an IDL-specific question) [message #78735 is a reply to message #78732] Mon, 12 December 2011 05:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jasdeep Anand is currently offline  Jasdeep Anand
Messages: 16
Registered: August 2011
Junior Member
On Dec 12, 12:08 pm, Fabzou <fabien.mauss...@tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> I've noticed from the few examples I've seen from the web that both
>> TRIGRID and GRIDDATA can be used for this problem. How do both
>> routines differ from each other, and when should either one be used?
>
> Again, I am not the expert here, somebody might jump in to add some
> info, but GRIDDATA has more interpolation options than TRIGRID does.
>
> The choice of the interpolation scheme is highly dependent of the type
> of data you are willing to interpolate and their own spatial validity.
> What kind of data do you want to interpolate?

Fabozu,

I'm currently investigating pollution trends (namely NO2) over large
areas using data from the OMI (AURA) instrument. The pixels at nadir
have a size of 13 x 24 km, but I want to regrid those to a much higher
resolution. I would ideally like an uninterrupted dataset without
missing pixels so I can do a Fourier analysis around certain latitude
bands, which is why I'm looking to interpolate them in the first
place.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDLDOC 3.4.1 Problem
Next Topic: Coyote Graphics Updates

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:03:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00460 seconds