comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: One Reason Python is not taking over for IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: One Reason Python is not taking over for IDL [message #78848 is a reply to message #78759] Wed, 21 December 2011 12:31 Go to previous message
Russell[1] is currently offline  Russell[1]
Messages: 101
Registered: August 2011
Senior Member
I've recently graduated to IDL >8 (specifically 8.1), and for the most
part everything is in good shape. I don't, on the other hand, use
many of the new features and largely still do things "the old
fashioned way" (e.g. using things like the procedural plotting
routines) because I work closely with people who are still using IDL
7.x and we share code. I'm anxious to learn about the new features
(and bugs), when my collaborators catch up!

I did have to change a few minor things --- but all of them are
backwards-compatible. But it was readily apparent what the problem(s)
are/were.

R

On Dec 21, 12:16 pm, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> Russell writes:
>> I'm willing to believe that Python is a better language, but never
>> because it's cheaper.  I'm willing to pay for a product that works.
>
> Humm. What do we say, then, about IDL 8.x? :-(
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming:http://www.idlcoyote.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: reading shapefiles & IDL objects
Next Topic: Re: Problem with the astron database on Mac OS X

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 30 02:10:53 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68826 seconds