comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Grumbling about setting double precision

Home » Public Forums » archive » Grumbling about setting double precision

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Grumbling about setting double precision [message #78851 is a reply to message #78788]

Wed, 21 December 2011 10:44

Kenneth P. Bowman
Messages: 585
Registered: May 2000

Senior Member

In article <MPG.295bcfa9c9a365f0989962@news.giganews.com>,
David Fanning <news@dfanning.com> wrote:

> Kenneth P. Bowman writes:
>
>> David, you're always such a pessimist!
>
> I'm just saying, my primary motivation is to prevent
> repetitive strain disorder. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David

And, to be clear, my solution makes sense if you have a block of contiguous
constant definitions, or a small number of source programs with constants
located at the top of the program, but that assumes reasonably well written code.

I guess I would be pessimistic too.

Ken

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Grumbling about setting double precision By: wlandsman on Tue, 20 December 2011 08:58
		Re: Grumbling about setting double precision By: Karl[1] on Thu, 22 December 2011 12:08
		Re: Grumbling about setting double precision By: Kenneth P. Bowman on Wed, 21 December 2011 10:44

Previous Topic:	Problem with the astron database on Mac OS X
Next Topic:	LUSOL for Sparse Matrices using Sprsin?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 09:17:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.07927 seconds