comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Name of arrays
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Name of arrays [message #79321 is a reply to message #79269] Tue, 21 February 2012 14:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline  Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
Senior Member
Ha! :o)

Early on, IDL was a fancy interface for Fortran. (Just like matlab :o)

But, to get back to David's original point, one should not treat syntactic sugar with disdain. IMO, for the 99.9% of
programmers out there (most definitely including moi), a fancy interface for pointers -- that does not expose the
pointer-y-ness -- is *exactly* what is needed (I cringe when I look at some of my older widget programs...).

Long live the hash().

cheers,

paulv


Paulo Penteado wrote:
> On Feb 21, 7:43 pm, David Fanning <n...@idlcoyote.com> wrote:
>> A hash is nothing more than an fancy interface for
>> pointers.
>
> So, similarly, IDL is nothing more than a fancy interface for C?
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: GRIB Webinar
Next Topic: Re: new graphics error message [_IDLITCONTAINER::SETPROPERTY]

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 00:44:55 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68499 seconds