comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » RE: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense

Home » Public Forums » archive » RE: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense [message #8036 is a reply to message #8020]

Thu, 30 January 1997 00:00

davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996

Senior Member

Brian Handy is traveling and unable to post to this newsgroup,
but he points out to me that for his angstrom symbol he uses this:

ang = STRING(197B)

He claims it works on the display and in PostScript files.

I don't know. I think it should be disqualified as being *way*
too easy. Most of us programmer types would feel
uncomfortable with it.

Thanks, Brian!

David

-----------------------------------------------------------
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
2642 Bradbury Court, Fort Collins, CO 80521
Phone: 970-221-0438 Fax: 970-221-4762
E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com
-----------------------------------------------------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		RE: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: mallozzi on Sun, 02 February 1997 00:00
		Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: davidf on Sun, 02 February 1997 00:00
		Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: steinhh on Sun, 02 February 1997 00:00
		Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: Andy Loughe on Fri, 31 January 1997 00:00
		Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: Andy Loughe on Fri, 31 January 1997 00:00
		Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: davidf on Fri, 31 January 1997 00:00
		Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: thompson on Fri, 31 January 1997 00:00
		Re: Angstrom Symbol Nonsense By: davidf on Thu, 30 January 1997 00:00

Previous Topic:	S: catching the output of help,/mem into variable-programm ???
Next Topic:	Speckle

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:28:05 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00803 seconds