comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Is MAP procedure in IDL8.2 BROKEN?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Is MAP procedure in IDL8.2 BROKEN?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Is MAP procedure in IDL8.2 BROKEN? [message #81458]

Fri, 21 September 2012 06:08

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

titan writes:

>> Try putting a compile_opt idl2 statement in your
>> program.

> Thanks a lot David,
>
> your suggestion was correct!

I've found that using this compile_opt idl2 statement
is practically required in any program running in IDL 8.x.
I think it is because the function graphics routines just
appropriated too many common programming words (map, image,
etc.).

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Is MAP procedure in IDL8.2 BROKEN? By: David Fanning on Fri, 21 September 2012 06:08
		Re: Is MAP procedure in IDL8.2 BROKEN? By: titan on Fri, 21 September 2012 05:33
		Re: Is MAP procedure in IDL8.2 BROKEN? By: David Fanning on Fri, 21 September 2012 05:25

Previous Topic:	Is MAP procedure in IDL8.2 BROKEN?
Next Topic:	Plot Size difference

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Nov 30 15:42:13 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24066 seconds