| Re: PLOTS versus POLYLINE [message #82163 is a reply to message #82107] |
Wed, 21 November 2012 11:19   |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Brian McNoldy writes:
> Well, this may not be the ideal solution, but that bug seems to come about because of the poles. If you add LIMIT=[-89,0,89,360] to the MAP call, it gets rid of the extraneous labels. ???
Ah, thanks! :-)
While I was updating the code that compares contour plots
on map projections with Brian's suggestions, I noticed
a couple of other things I was doing wrong (still had
map projections in the two contour plot commands that I
didn't need anymore).
Fixing all of that made the function graphics contour
plot even faster than before. The same plot in IDL 8
rendered in about 6 seconds. The current plot renders
in a little less than 2 seconds. This is a significant
speed-up!
You can see the comparisons here:
http://www.idlcoyote.com/cg_tips/conpcont.php
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
