comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Physical constants in IDL with !CONST
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Physical constants in IDL with !CONST [message #82587 is a reply to message #82525] Thu, 20 December 2012 07:03 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ben.bighair is currently offline  ben.bighair
Messages: 221
Registered: April 2007
Senior Member
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:37:12 AM UTC-5, Chris Torrence wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:43:16 PM UTC-7, Craig Markwardt wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:36:24 PM UTC-5, Jeff N. wrote:
>
>>
>
>>> Chris,
>
>>
>
>>>
>
>>
>
>>>
>
>>
>
>>>
>
>>
>
>>> If you're going to put pi in there, which we already have in !pi, you might also consider putting !dtor and !radeg in as well, otherwise people might be wondering why !pi was put into !const but not the other two.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> But if you do, then put the double precision values! !DTOR is worse than useless for me because it's only single precision.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> Craig
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> These are great suggestions.
>
>
>
> Paul, I just added in all of your constants except "c1" and "c2". There seems to be a discrepancy with the definition of c1. NIST gives it as 2.pi.h.c^2, which is a factor of "pi" bigger than your constant. I don't want anyone to get confused and just use the constant blindly, perhaps including an unexpected extra factor of pi. Which one is in "standard" use?
>
>
>
> Craig, I'll add in the AU, and the mass of the Sun & Earth. And of course "dtor" and "radeg" (double precision!). But don't worry, the older system variables won't go away.
>
>
>
> Russell, great suggestion on including more info, like the "units". I'd love to do that, but I don't want to make the structure too complicated. What about having a second system variable, say something like !CONST_UNITS, which could contain additional information?

Hi,

Great idea1 Would it be a pain to call it something like !K instead of !CONST for all of the keyboard-bumblers out there (like me)? It might be nice to include the reference for each definition if they come from different standards.

Have you considered the possibility of using an object in the system variable?

mass = 12*!K->get("u", /value)
print, "mass = ", mass, !K->Get("u", /unit)

It might be nice if it were the possibile to support two kinds of constants - built-in and user defined. The built-in would be read only, but the user defined could be added/modified as the user sees fit at start-up or whenever. At least that would provide a unified interface.

Cheers,
Ben
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: What are the rules for automatic removal of singleton dimensions, and can I have a way of disabling them, please?
Next Topic: day or night

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Apr 14 00:02:38 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.12383 seconds