comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Interesting article in Nature
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Interesting article in Nature [message #83021 is a reply to message #83018] Thu, 31 January 2013 07:21 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Russell Ryan is currently offline  Russell Ryan
Messages: 122
Registered: May 2012
Senior Member
I generally acknowledge the "tool" in professional papers if the tool is either non-standard (like I've developed some optimization routines in IDL) or am using non-standard settings of standard routines. In some cases the author(s) of the code(s) publish papers on them, so citing my source is easy. But in the case of IDL, I generally just say something like: "... for this we implement [some algorithm] in IDL\footnote{GIVE EXELIS URL}..." Though, I've never published in Nature...

On Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:15:17 AM UTC-5, Mark Piper wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 4:24:09 PM UTC-7, Paulo Penteado wrote:
>
>> It is not everyday that choosing IDL over other languages gets
>
>>
>
>> discussed in Nature:
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> "The algorithms to be incorporated were varied, and included codes for
>
>>
>
>> estimating snow coverage, grain size and absorption of solar radiation
>
>>
>
>> by dust and black carbon. They had been written in IDL, a specialized
>
>>
>
>> programming language used by many researchers. Geographers, remote
>
>>
>
>> sensing experts and software programmers contributed.
>
>>
>
>> Most computer scientists would assume that such a system would take
>
>>
>
>> years, not weeks, to develop. The algorithms would presumably have to
>
>>
>
>> be rewritten in a standard language such as C++, Java or Python, or
>
>>
>
>> one that could run on a fast computer system or infrastructure, such
>
>>
>
>> as Google’s MapReduce model.
>
>>
>
>> But, in my experience, there is no need to rewrite scientific
>
>>
>
>> algorithms for bigdata systems. Rewriting only increases the barriers
>
>>
>
>> to communication between scientists and computer engineers. Rewriting
>
>>
>
>> can also introduce costly errors."
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> From
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/493473a
>
>
>
> Thank you, Paulo, for linking to this article. I love to post articles such as this internally at VIS to try to help people understand how and why IDL is important to us who use it.
>
>
>
> mp
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: toolbar and tab not active
Next Topic: 2D Savitzky-Golay derivative filter?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 03:32:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87896 seconds