comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL 8.2.2 released
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL 8.2.2 released [message #83184 is a reply to message #83056] Thu, 07 February 2013 09:11 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
chris_torrence@NOSPAM is currently offline  chris_torrence@NOSPAM
Messages: 528
Registered: March 2007
Senior Member
On Thursday, February 7, 2013 9:20:55 AM UTC-7, Matt wrote:
> Mark Piper writes:
>
>
>
>> This is a tough one, and IDL's blessing/curse of a single namespace is the
>
>> problem.
>
>
>
> I understand the curse of a single namespace, what are the blessings? This
>
> is actually a serious question. I can see no advantages to a user that we
>
> are stuck with a single namespace. Is there any remote hope of this in the
>
> future?
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthew Savoie - Senior Software Developer
>
> National Snow and Ice Data Center
>
> (303) 735-0785 http://nsidc.org

Hi Matt,

That is a great question. IDL's path management was based off of a Unix/Vax operating environment. If an executable is on your path, then your call will succeed. If it's not on your path, then your call will fail. If there are two copies on the path, then the first one wins.

This is simple, easy to understand and explain, and works well, up to a point!

IDL was designed and marketed as a "complete" solution, where you get everything in the box. There have been very few "add-on" packages where you might need to worry about namespaces and libraries. As Mark pointed out, we encouraged outside developers to use a prefix when creating their libraries, like David has done with his "cg" routines. That is an excellent approach.

Perhaps IDL has reached the threshold where we need to start worrying about namespaces, libraries, and packages. But if we do add support for that, we need to do it in a way that is backwards compatible, and is actually useful for a majority of our customers (both current and future users).

Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Chris
IDL Project Lead
ExelisVIS
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: netCDF adding variable to an existing file
Next Topic: nearest node of Delauny tesselation

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 16:07:49 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00251 seconds