comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough [message #83699 is a reply to message #83695]

Wed, 27 March 2013 12:19

MarioIncandenza
Messages: 231
Registered: February 2005

Senior Member

On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:56:42 AM UTC-7, Craig Markwardt wrote:
> But how much time does the TRANSPOSE() operation take?

Well, in the actual case I'm working on, there is no transpose, the arrays are built with the dimensions in the correct order. I'm starting to think that the basic process of allocating the memory for this large array is the rate-limiting step, and I don't know what to do about that.

--Edward H.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Wed, 27 March 2013 20:40
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: MarioIncandenza on Wed, 27 March 2013 15:49
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: MarioIncandenza on Wed, 27 March 2013 12:19
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: Craig Markwardt on Wed, 27 March 2013 09:56
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: MarioIncandenza on Wed, 27 March 2013 09:14
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: Jeremy Bailin on Wed, 27 March 2013 08:14
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: Kenneth Bowman on Wed, 27 March 2013 07:42
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: lecacheux.alain on Wed, 27 March 2013 07:15
		Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough By: Brian Daniel on Wed, 27 March 2013 06:52

Previous Topic:	Re: volume() command
Next Topic:	Regression fit and random noise

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:51:26 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.64140 seconds