comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Using "the IDL way" and it's still not fast enough [message #83705 is a reply to message #83699] Wed, 27 March 2013 09:56 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Craig Markwardt is currently offline  Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996
Senior Member
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:14:23 PM UTC-4, Edward Hyer wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:42:58 AM UTC-7, KenBowman wrote:
>
>> I don't think so. In IDL the first array index varies fastest (is
>
>> contiguous in memory).
>
>
>
> That's correct. Just for posterity, here is the test I did to show just how much faster it is to MIN along the first dimension:

But how much time does the TRANSPOSE() operation take?
Craig
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: volume() command
Next Topic: Regression fit and random noise

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 03:33:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55071 seconds