comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Ternary Plot in IDL?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Ternary Plot in IDL? [message #83900 is a reply to message #83820] Tue, 09 April 2013 23:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
JP is currently offline  JP
Messages: 55
Registered: April 2008
Member
Michael,

What's the difference between the library which can be accessed (and downloaded) from https://github.com/mgalloy/mglib (which includes the mg_ternaryplot procedure you mentioned) from the vis_ternaryPlot one documented in http://docs.idldev.com/vis/lineplots/vis_ternaryplot.html ?

JP



On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 00:27:11 UTC+10, Mike Galloy wrote:
> On 4/9/13 12:49 am, JP wrote:
>
>> Googled that in the group and it doesn't seem to be anything done for that yet althought ppl have asked about it every now and then.
>
>>
>
>> I am after a ternary plot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_plot
>
>> Was told that R has a function for it: http://rss.acs.unt.edu/Rdoc/library/vcd/html/ternaryplot.htm l
>
>>
>
>> Wouldn't it be great if there was something like it in IDL?
>
>>
>
>> maybe a cgTernaryPlot procedure? ;) ;)
>
>
>
> Here's a start in direct graphics:
>
>
>
>
>
> https://github.com/mgalloy/mglib/blob/master/src/vis/lineplo ts/mg_ternaryplot.pro
>
>
>
> Mike
>
> --
>
> Michael Galloy
>
> www.michaelgalloy.com
>
> Modern IDL: A Guide to IDL Programming (http://modernidl.idldev.com)
>
> Research Mathematician
>
> Tech-X Corporation
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDLdoc 3.6.0 released
Next Topic: Possible to create 'keyword_used' type function?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:23:37 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00317 seconds