comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Modifying Arrays and Structures in HASH's (hint: you can't)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Modifying Arrays and Structures in HASH's (hint: you can't) [message #85389 is a reply to message #85385] Tue, 30 July 2013 04:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
m_schellens is currently offline  m_schellens
Messages: 31
Registered: February 2005
Member
Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2013 10:55:37 UTC+2 schrieb fawltyl...@gmail.com:
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 12:46:21 AM UTC+2, mschellens wrote:
>
>
>
>> Good. So what about _OVERLOADBRACKETSLEFTSIDE ?
>
>> Does FL use the interface I suggested as well?
>
>
>
> No. HASH and LIST do not use _OVERLOADBRACKETSLEFTSIDE at all for performance reasons, subscripting is implemented at a lower level. _OVERLOADBRACKETSLEFTSIDE methods exist only for compatibility, they can be called directly, but they are much slower then subscripting.
>
>
>
>> Would be in everybody's interest if all implementations are compatible.
>
>> Unless you have (or anybody else has) a better idea.
>
>
>
> IDL syntax and semantics are designed by Exelis, I don't think we can change that. We can only implement IDL better :-)

Well, as it is currently not available in IDL at all, my suggestion still stands alone. For the sake of IDL I hope Exelis will eventually implement it as well.

Regards,
Marc
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Does anyone have any experience with using SciDB with IDL (or any other language)?
Next Topic: Find all user-defined structure definitions

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 06:13:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68482 seconds