| Re: What subprogram? What parameters and keywords? [message #85701 is a reply to message #85648] |
Wed, 28 August 2013 13:52   |
![Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline](theme/default/images/xoffline.png.pagespeed.ic.XRkd1fkXye.png "Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline")
Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 08/23/13 11:29, Michael Galloy wrote:
> On 8/23/13 8:50 am, fawltylanguage@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, August 23, 2013 4:35:56 PM UTC+2, Mark Piper wrote:
>>
>>> We're looking at introducing the equivalent of argc-argv, where
>>> argv[0] is the name of the routine and argv[1-n] are the
>>> parameters. Ronn Kling suggested that a list would be a good
>>> container for this info. How about new intrinsic routines IDL_ARGC
>>> and IDL_ARGV?
That would be marvyplate.
>> We have keyword parameters, so a HASH seems to be more appropriate.
>> #0 can be the routine name, #1, #2, ... the positional parameters.
>>
>> regards, Lajos
>>
>
> How about a hash for the keywords and a list for the positional parameters?
+1 for the hash<->keywords idea. A list for keywords doesn't make too
much sense (to me at least).
cheers,
paulv
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
