comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Inverse hyperbolics?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Inverse hyperbolics? [message #85826 is a reply to message #85811]

Thu, 12 September 2013 02:58

tom.grydeland
Messages: 51
Registered: September 2012

Member

On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:14:43 PM UTC+2, Mark Piper wrote:

> This is a very reasonable request.

Glad you think so! :-)

> While we're at it, maybe we should add secant, cosecant and cotangent functions.

... and their hyperbolic counterparts?

> And a log base 2 function.

Certainly.

> http://www.exelisvis.com/docs/routines-65.html
> Any others?

We've found that an 'EXPI' function, returning 'COMPLEX(COS(X), SIN(X))', would give a significant improvement in performance over 'EXP(I*X)' for a real argument.

> mp

--T

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Inverse hyperbolics? By: tom.grydeland on Wed, 11 September 2013 03:48
		Re: Inverse hyperbolics? By: Mark Piper on Wed, 11 September 2013 09:14
		Re: Inverse hyperbolics? By: suicidaleggroll on Wed, 11 September 2013 09:34
		Re: Inverse hyperbolics? By: Mark Piper on Wed, 11 September 2013 09:55
		Re: Inverse hyperbolics? By: Lajos Foldy on Wed, 11 September 2013 12:28
		Re: Inverse hyperbolics? By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Wed, 11 September 2013 14:20
		Re: Inverse hyperbolics? By: Lajos Foldy on Thu, 12 September 2013 01:20
		Re: Inverse hyperbolics? By: tom.grydeland on Thu, 12 September 2013 02:58

Previous Topic:	pointer to function
Next Topic:	strsplit vectorized

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 04:37:16 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40140 seconds