comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » negative array index in IDL8

Home » Public Forums » archive » negative array index in IDL8

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: negative array index in IDL8 [message #86380 is a reply to message #86379]

Fri, 01 November 2013 19:38

chuxiangning
Messages: 17
Registered: September 2012

Junior Member

On Friday, November 1, 2013 3:18:24 PM UTC-7, wlandsman wrote:
> Not the answer to the question you are asking, but if you are only using IDL8 or above, you could mindlessly add /NULL to all your WHERE() statements ( or write a simple script to do this). This is likely easier than adding tests for negative indices. --Wayne

Thanks for the solution. It is ok for new codes. It is all the codes and packages already written that might return wrong results with IDL 8. And we can afford to change them. One simple solution is 'don't buy IDL 8'.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		negative array index in IDL8 By: chuxiangning on Fri, 01 November 2013 10:38
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: suicidaleggroll on Fri, 01 November 2013 11:55
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: David Fanning on Fri, 01 November 2013 12:03
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: chuxiangning on Fri, 01 November 2013 13:05
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: David Fanning on Fri, 01 November 2013 13:31
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: wlandsman on Fri, 01 November 2013 15:18
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: chuxiangning on Fri, 01 November 2013 19:38
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: wlandsman on Sat, 02 November 2013 06:42
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: David Fanning on Sat, 02 November 2013 07:43
		Re: negative array index in IDL8 By: chuxiangning on Tue, 12 November 2013 12:21

Previous Topic:	derivative function in IDL similar as DIFF in matlab
Next Topic:	covariance matrix

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:31:40 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00431 seconds