comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Memory needed for IDL/Linux?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Memory needed for IDL/Linux? [message #8654 is a reply to message #8564] Thu, 10 April 1997 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
kak is currently offline  kak
Messages: 16
Registered: February 1995
Junior Member
thompson@orpheus.nascom.nasa.gov (William Thompson) writes:

> "Mark Hadfield" <m.hadfield@niwa.cri.nz> writes:

>> David Foster <foster@bial1.ucsd.edu> wrote in article

>> I don't want to start a platform war or anything, but I've noticed that IDL
>> on Windows NT doesn't use much memory when it starts up - around 3 MB for
>> 5.0b. What on earth does IDL use all that memory for on Solaris?

> I'm not sure about the situation via Windows NT versus Solaris, but I have
> noticed this sort of behavior on simple routines that were compiled on
> different platforms. It may have more to do with the platform's compiler than
> it does with IDL.

In the Solaris case, the 7MB total size is right, but the size in
physical memory (resident stack size) is 2.8MB. What size is given
by the WinNT output? Perhaps it does not include the pages in the
swap file?

Karl
--
IPP, PO Box 1533 | Phone: +49-89-3299-1655 | E-Mail:
D-85740 Garching | FAX : +49-89-3299-1149 | krieger@ipp.mpg.de
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: tiff_read files
Next Topic: Re: Sun Symbol in Postscript

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 16:03:47 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.84111 seconds