Re: Font size appearance in function graphics PNG and EPS output [message #86879 is a reply to message #86877] |
Mon, 09 December 2013 14:14   |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724 Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Phillip Bitzer writes:
> Negatory. In fact, I prefer EPS _because_ it has a bounding box, which plays very nicely with LaTeX. I haven't had a problem with IDL EPS files with latex or pdflatex. (For reference, I use PS_START/END, ... er cgPS_OPEN/CLOSE with /ENCAP set.) Generally speaking, journals prefer EPS, although most (all?) accept PDF as well. To hear Adobe tell it, PDF is more "advanced" than Postscript.
Yes, Adobe has a very high opinion of its software. I've recently
switched to the FoxIt PDF Reader so I no longer have to deal with the
Adobe Reader and all the &^$*#@ shortcuts it puts on my desktop when it
installs itself. :-)
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|