comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Object Field Name Conflicts

Home » Public Forums » archive » Object Field Name Conflicts

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Object Field Name Conflicts [message #87343 is a reply to message #87341]

Sun, 26 January 2014 07:33

Michael Galloy
Messages: 1114
Registered: April 2006

Senior Member

David Fanning <news@idlcoyote.com> wrote:
> Michael Galloy writes:
>
>>> help, { idl_object }
>> ** Structure IDL_OBJECT, 3 tags, length=24, data length=20:
>> IDL_OBJECT_TOP LONG64 0
>> __OBJ__ OBJREF <NullObject>
>> IDL_OBJECT_BOTTOM
>> LONG64 0
>
> Woohoo! Thanks.
>
> Is this another example of operator overloading?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David

I don't believe so. IDL objects have always been a named structure
definition plus more.

Mike
--
www.michaelgalloy.com
Research Mathematician
Tech-X Corporation

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Object Field Name Conflicts By: David Fanning on Sat, 25 January 2014 18:52
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: David Fanning on Sat, 25 January 2014 19:06
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: Michael Galloy on Sat, 25 January 2014 19:29
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: David Fanning on Sat, 25 January 2014 21:28
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: Michael Galloy on Sun, 26 January 2014 07:33
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: David Fanning on Sun, 26 January 2014 07:41
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: Lajos Foldy on Sun, 26 January 2014 08:07
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: David Fanning on Sun, 26 January 2014 08:09
		Re: Object Field Name Conflicts By: Phillip Bitzer on Sun, 26 January 2014 13:28

Previous Topic:	God save me!
Next Topic:	urgent-outliers removal

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 14:11:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00188 seconds