comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Object Field Name Conflicts
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Object Field Name Conflicts [message #87344 is a reply to message #87343] Sun, 26 January 2014 07:41 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Michael Galloy writes:

>
> David Fanning <news@idlcoyote.com> wrote:
>> Michael Galloy writes:
>>
>>>> help, { idl_object }
>>> ** Structure IDL_OBJECT, 3 tags, length=24, data length=20:
>>> IDL_OBJECT_TOP LONG64 0
>>> __OBJ__ OBJREF <NullObject>
>>> IDL_OBJECT_BOTTOM
>>> LONG64 0
>>
>> Woohoo! Thanks.
>>
>> Is this another example of operator overloading?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>
> I don't believe so. IDL objects have always been a named structure
> definition plus more.

I wonder if someone can check this for us in IDL 7, just to be sure.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: God save me!
Next Topic: urgent-outliers removal

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:54:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00390 seconds