comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » cgGallery with function graphics
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: cgGallery with function graphics [message #87803 is a reply to message #87800] Thu, 27 February 2014 08:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
David Fanning writes:

>
> Paul van Delst writes:
>
>> The only comment, well, request, I have is that you post the timing for
>> the plots also (e.g. using tic/toc).
>
> I don't know. There are a LOT of factors here. I'm not sure the numbers
> will allow us to compare apples with apples. I think we should just
> allow people to time things themselves. Then, the test is strictly based
> on how they are using the routines. Plus, many of the Coyote Graphics
> users don't have Tic and Toc. :-)

Just to give you an example. I ran both the Coyote Graphics and Function
Graphics basic line plot routines first to "initialize" the system.

Then I timed just the time to produce a plot.

Coyote Graphics: 0.0300 ; Probably slow because of circle symbol
Function Graphics: 0.0268

Then I timed the time to produce the plot and make a PostScript and PNG
file:

Coyote Graphics: 1.672
Function Graphics: 4.398 ; Probably slow because of big PNG file

If I make a big PNG file with Coyote Graphics, then I get a time of
3.091.

So, I don't know. My impression is always that Function Graphics
routines are slower, but I have no idea how MUCH slower. I think if you
have a reasonable high tolerance for complicated things not always
working right, you are probably OK with function graphics. In my tests
of hardcopy output (the only thing I really care about, usually), I find
Coyote Graphics work more intuitively than Function Graphics and produce
identical results. When I build applications that are to go in front of
a user, I tend to use object graphics, but only because I find these a
little more reliable than function graphics. (The pressure plot saga of
this morning seems to happen to me a LOT when I use function graphics. I
think I must have an undiscovered and unintentional talent for breaking
those things!)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: How to align two images IDL
Next Topic: Is a Class diagram of catalyst avaliable ?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 21:56:49 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48604 seconds