comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » No Raster Image via Imagemagick

Home » Public Forums » archive » No Raster Image via Imagemagick

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick [message #88979 is a reply to message #88978]

Wed, 09 July 2014 12:57

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

David Fanning writes:

> Is the resulting image of crappy quality? In my experience, the output
> from cgWindow is at least as good as (and sometimes better) than the
> output from the function graphics routines.
>
> http://www.idlcoyote.com/cg_tips/compcont.php

Whoops! This is the link I meant to give you to compare graphics output:

http://www.idlcoyote.com/cg_tips/cgwfg.php

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Wed, 09 July 2014 11:12
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Wed, 09 July 2014 12:53
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Wed, 09 July 2014 12:57
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 05:34
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 July 2014 06:53
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:00
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:13
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:16
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:58
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 09:57

Previous Topic:	improve calculation time
Next Topic:	computation time for convolution

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 20:21:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40139 seconds