comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow.
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. [message #89018 is a reply to message #89017] Tue, 15 July 2014 07:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
jlpippitt@comcast.net writes:

> Z buffer seems to be enhancing our plots of radar imagery. Plotting in the x-window gives us the correct result. We produce a lot of imagery so using Z-buffer is necessary. Is there a away to make a z_buffer image appear the same as an x window image.

The Z-buffer uses a slightly different character size than the normal
display device. And, unfortunately, this affects things like the plot
margins and regions, which are expressed in character size units. To
make sure everything "aligns", you have to make sure you position your
graphics with the POSITION keyword. Otherwise, you won't be able to
align them with your images, etc.

Almost all of this is done for you, if you were to use Coyote Graphics
routines to display your data. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: the problem of symbol Function
Next Topic: How to disable tick labels on right and top when using cgMap?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:13:14 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00431 seconds