comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow.

Home » Public Forums » archive » Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow.

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. [message #89020 is a reply to message #89019]

Tue, 15 July 2014 12:02

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

jlpippitt@comcast.net writes:

> Thank you for your response. I think z-buffer is applying some kind of smoothing to the data. Holes appear in a precipitation field in the x-window (which is the true representation of the data) while the images created with z-buffer the holes are filled in (maybe nearest pixel smoothing). I think it would be beneficial to see the images I am referring to. Is there a way to post images on here?

I seriously doubt there is smoothing going on in the Z-buffer. Are you
using the Z-buffer for actual buffering, or have you turned this off and
are just using the Z-buffer as another graphics window? Have you set the
size of the Z-buffer to match the size of your graphics window?

There is no way I know of to post images, here, but I doubt looking at
an image would be helpful anyway. It would probably be more helpful to
look at your code.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: jlpippitt on Tue, 15 July 2014 06:46
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 July 2014 07:13
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: jlpippitt on Tue, 15 July 2014 11:57
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 July 2014 12:02
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: jlpippitt on Wed, 16 July 2014 04:34
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: David Fanning on Wed, 16 July 2014 05:25
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: jlpippitt on Wed, 16 July 2014 05:53
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: David Fanning on Wed, 16 July 2014 06:26
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: Michael Galloy on Wed, 16 July 2014 10:12
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: jlpippitt on Wed, 16 July 2014 11:56
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: David Fanning on Wed, 16 July 2014 13:30
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: bkelley_1 on Wed, 16 July 2014 16:12
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: Karl[1] on Wed, 16 July 2014 17:16
		Re: Plotting results from z-buffer are diffrenet than xwindow. By: bkelley_1 on Thu, 17 July 2014 16:48

Previous Topic:	the problem of symbol Function
Next Topic:	How to disable tick labels on right and top when using cgMap?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 10:37:17 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68487 seconds