comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Bug or desired behavior in lambda functions?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Bug or desired behavior in lambda functions?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Bug or desired behavior in lambda functions? [message #91152 is a reply to message #91146]

Tue, 09 June 2015 08:42

penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018

Senior Member
Administrator

Neat trick!

Thanks.

> I experimented with the same thing, I found this to work:
>
> IDL> expr='x: x^2
> IDL> l=lambda(expr)
> % LAMBDA: Code must be of the form "arg1,arg2,... : statement"
> % Execution halted at: $MAIN$
> IDL> l=lambda(''+expr)
> IDL> l(2)
> 4

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Bug or desired behavior in lambda functions? By: penteado on Mon, 08 June 2015 10:34
		Re: Bug or desired behavior in lambda functions? By: penteado on Mon, 08 June 2015 13:31
		Re: Bug or desired behavior in lambda functions? By: PMallas on Tue, 09 June 2015 06:09
		Re: Bug or desired behavior in lambda functions? By: penteado on Tue, 09 June 2015 08:42

Previous Topic:	Identify whether value is integer in IF statement
Next Topic:	Multiple Processing

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 28 06:23:42 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00953 seconds